Topic A
What to do if I had 75 billion dollars to change de World?
Firstly, in my opinion human kind’s problems can’t be solved with money. Economy was our creation, as it has come from us, it’s not the solution. First of all, we need values, we need to learn how to be people, we need to learn how to love, how to be kind, how to be patient, how not to be such idiots and learn how to respect the world. That ain’t going to be solved with money! So, we’re hopeless.
I share Lomborg’s opinion*, I would supply food to pour kids, I would help the ones that really need and care about something.
Secondly, I would try to build schools and hospitals for those kids, so they would have a better and healthier development.
In conclusion, no one needs 75 or 80 or even 100 billion dollars to change the world, if every one of us tried to be a better person, if everyone of us give an apple to another person in this world, we would be better. We would be great, we would be humans. Brothers.
Lomborg defende que é mais importante acabar com a fome no mundo, do que gastar dinheiro em problemas ambientais que podem ou não ser resolvidos. Sendo que o mundo está em constante destruição, salvar o ambiente não é certo, ajudar pessoas é.
Acho nobre, a opinião desse Lomborg, mas acredito que seja preciso balançar a coisa. Se não salvarmos o ambiente, isso conduzirá à nossa destruição e não haverão crianças para salvar. Se não salvarmos a crianças, o que acontecerá com o Amanhã?
ResponderExcluirTemos que colocar todos estes assuntos numa balança e distribuir o peso :)